COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The content of this website, including text and images, is the property of The Nietzsche Channel. Reproduction in any form is strictly prohibited. © The Nietzsche Channel. Beyond Good and Evil
Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. 1886. Preface
Supposing truth is a woman—what then? Are there not grounds for the suspicion that all philosophers, insofar as they were dogmatists, have been very inexpert about women? that the gruesome seriousness, the clumsy obtrusiveness with which they have usually approached truth so far have been awkward and very improper methods for winning a woman's heart? What is certain is that she has not allowed herself to be won:—and today every kind of dogmatism is left standing dispirited and discouraged. If it is left standing at all! For there are scoffers who claim that it has fallen, that all dogmatism lies on the ground, even more, that all dogmatism is dying. Speaking seriously, there are good reasons why all philosophical dogmatizing, however solemn and definitive its airs used to be, may nevertheless have been no more than a noble childishness and tyronism; and perhaps the time is at hand when it will be comprehended again and again what actually was sufficient to furnish the cornerstone for such sublime and unconditional philosophers' edifices as the dogmatists have built so far—any old popular superstition from time immemorial (like the soul superstition which, in the form of the subject and ego superstition, has not even yet ceased to do mischief), some play on words perhaps, a seduction by grammar, or an audacious generalization of very narrow, very personal, very human, all too human facts. The dogmatists' philosophy was, let us hope, only a promise across millennia: as astrology was in still earlier times when perhaps more work, money, acumen, and patience were expended than for any real science so far:—to astrology and its "supernatural" pretensions we owe the grand style of architecture in Asia and Egypt. It seems that all great things first have to bestride the earth in monstrous and frightening caricatures in order to inscribe themselves in the hearts of humanity with eternal demands: dogmatic philosophy was such a caricature, for example the Vedanta doctrine in Asia and Platonism in Europe. Let us not be ungrateful to it, although it must certainly be conceded that the worst, most protracted, and most dangerous of all errors so far was a dogmatist's error, namely Plato's invention of the pure spirit and the good in itself. But now that it is overcome, now that Europe is breathing a sigh of relief after this nightmare and at least can enjoy a healthier—sleep, we, whose task is wakefulness itself, are the heirs of all that strength which has been fostered by the struggle against this error. To be sure, it meant standing truth on its head and denying perspective, the basic condition of all life, when one spoke of spirit and the good as Plato did, indeed, as a physician one might ask: "How could the most beautiful plant of antiquity, Plato, contract such a disease? Did the wicked Socrates corrupt him after all? Could Socrates have been the corrupter of youth after all? And deserved his hemlock?"— But the struggle against Plato or, to speak more clearly and for "the people," the struggle against the Christian-ecclesiastical pressure of millennia—for Christianity is Platonism for "the people"—has created in Europe a splendid tension of the spirit the like of which has never yet existed on earth: with so tense a bow we can now shoot for the most distant targets. To be sure, European man experiences this tension as a state of distress; twice already attempts have been made in the grand style to slacken the bow, once by means of Jesuitism, the second time by means of the democratic Enlightenment:—which, with the aid of freedom of the press and newspaper-reading, might indeed bring it about that the spirit would no longer experience itself so easily as "distress"! (The Germans have invented gunpowder—hats off to them! but then they made up for that—they invented the press.) But we who are neither Jesuits nor democrats, nor even German enough, we good Europeans and free, very free spirits—we still feel it, the whole distress of the spirit and the whole tension of its bow! And perhaps also the arrow, the task, who knows? the target ..... Sils-Maria, Upper Engadine
June 1885. |